Cases 1 - 10 of 2,905
Rupp v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00583
Petitioner:
Joshua Louis Rupp
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Ramirez v. USA
as 2:2024cv11421
Petitioner:
Juan Ramirez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Mims v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00552
Petitioner:
Tommy Terrell Mims
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Paulk v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00546
Petitioner:
Monquel Dejuan-Lee Paulk
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Butler v. USA
as 3:2024cv11299
Petitioner:
Dewayne Javon Butler
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Brown v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00498
Petitioner:
Deandrea Anthony Brown
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Pointer v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00283
Petitioner:
Kenneth Christopher Pointer
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Harris v. USA
as 2:2024cv11293
Petitioner:
Lorenzo Harris
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Hall v. USA
as 2:2024cv11289
Petitioner:
Dontay Terrell Hall
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Cortez v. USA
as 2:2024cv11202
Petitioner:
Demas Hernandez Cortez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
