Cases 11 - 20 of 8,836
Kocevar v. Swartz
as 3:2024cv00876
Petitioner:
Peyton Kocevar
Defendant:
Warden Michael Swartz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sanders v. State of Ohio
as 5:2024cv00877
Petitioner:
J.C. Devar Sanders
Defendant:
State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
WOODRUFF v. STATE OF OHIO
as 2:2024cv01416
Petitioner:
JONATHAN L. WOODRUFF
Respondent:
State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jarmon v. Warden Southeastern Correctional Institution
as 1:2024cv00278
Petitioner:
Daniel R. Jarmon
Respondent:
Warden Southeastern Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reed v. Hunsinger
as 3:2024cv00859
Petitioner:
Jeff Reed
Respondent:
Angela Hunsinger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
DAVENPORT v. MILLER et al
as 2:2024cv02364
Petitioner:
AUSTIN R. DAVENPORT
Respondent:
ANDY D. MILLER, DANEL J. CABLE, ESRA BETUL OZTURK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Smith v. Reynolds
as 2:2024cv02368
Petitioner:
Gage L. Smith
Respondent:
Warden Stephen Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
King v. Watson
as 2:2024cv02365
Petitioner:
Richard N. King
Respondent:
Tom Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Reynolds
as 1:2024cv00517
Petitioner:
Gage L. Smith
Respondent:
Warden Stephen Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Malvasi v. Warden David W. Gray
as 4:2024cv00474
Petitioner:
Michael Malvasi
Respondent:
Warden David W. Gray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
