Cases 201 - 210 of 8,857
Hamilton, Jr. v. Stuff
as 1:2023cv01465
Petitioner:
Anton D. Hamilton, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Angela Stuff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shank v. Gray
as 1:2023cv01547
Petitioner:
Patrick J. Shank
Respondent:
Warden David Gray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott v. May
as 3:2023cv01374
Petitioner:
Gerald G. Scott
Respondent:
Warden Harold May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Horne v. Rardin
as 4:2023cv01397
Petitioner:
Gregory L. Horne
Defendant:
Warden E. Rardin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gutierrez v. United States of America
as 3:2023cv01629
Petitioner:
Gabriel Gutierrez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Kirby v. Warden, Madison Correctional Institution
as 1:2023cv00424
Plaintiff:
Bryan Kirby
Defendant:
Warden Jenny Hildebrand and Court of Common Pleas, Butler County, Ohio
Respondent:
Warden, Madison Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Andrews v. McConahay
as 1:2023cv01666
Petitioner:
Ce'Matizea Andrews
Respondent:
Warden Tim McConahay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Elliott v. Forshey
as 4:2023cv01320
Petitioner:
Jody A. Elliott
Respondent:
Warden Jay Forshey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mirafuentes-Valdez v. Warden, FCI Elkton
as 4:2023cv01289
Petitioner:
Jesus Mirafuentes-Valdez and Warden, FCI Elkton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cutlip v. Warden, Correctional Reception Center
as 2:2023cv02574
Petitioner:
Benjamin Cutlip
Respondent:
Warden, Correctional Reception Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
