General Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 76
Alexander Bowers v. People of the State of MI
as 16-2325
Plaintiff - Appellant: ALEXANDER CHRISTIAN BOWERS
Respondent - Appellee: PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN
Steven Hendricks v. Thomas Winn
as 16-1963
Petitioner - Appellant: STEVEN LYNN HENDRICKS
Respondent - Appellee: THOMAS WINN, identified on initiating document as People of the State of Michigan
Jones v. People of the State of Michigan
as 2:2016cv12452
Petitioner: Anthony Jones
Respondent: People of the State of Michigan
Eric Welch v. People of State of Michigan
as 16-1330
Petitioner - Appellant: ERIC DEXTER WELCH
Respondent - Appellee: PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN
Davis v. People of the State of Michigan We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv13890
Petitioner: Andre Davis
Respondent: People of the State of Michigan
Scott Cole v. Carmen Palmer
as 15-1413
Petitioner - Appellant: SCOTT BRADY COLE
Respondent - Appellee: CARMEN DENISE PALMER, Warden, named as "People of the State of Michigan"
Pilton v. People of the State of Michigan We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv10455
Petitioner: Elliot Pilton
Respondent: People of the State of Michigan
Welch v. People of the State of Michigan We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv00243
Petitioner: Eric Dexter Welch
Respondent: People of the State of Michigan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Daniel Marin v. Lloyd Rapelje, et al
as 14-2359
Petitioner - Appellant: DANIEL MARIN
Respondent - Appellee: LLOYD RAPELJE, Warden, J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK, Respondent (Intervenor) and PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN
Marin v. Rapelje et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2014cv12400
Petitioner: Daniel Marin
Respondent: Lloyd Rapalje, J.P. Morgan Chase Bank and People of the State of Michigan

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?