Cases 1 - 10 of 103
Sealy v. The United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv00645
Petitioner:
Dessalines Sealy
Respondent:
The United States of America, Ebonoluwa A. Taiwo, Timothy S. Mungan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jones v. Fender
as 1:2023cv01866
Petitioner:
Lee Jones
Respondent:
Warden Douglas Fender
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Gray
as 4:2023cv01650
Petitioner:
Aaron L. Jones, Sr.
Respondent:
Warden David W. Gray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Fender
as 1:2023cv01383
Petitioner:
Lee Jones
Respondent:
Warden Douglas Fender
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Garrett
as 3:2023cv00653
Petitioner:
Lawrence C. Jones
Respondent:
C. Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jones v. Montgomery County Jail
as 3:2023cv00076
Petitioner:
Thomas J. Jones
Respondent:
Montgomery County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Shoop
as 2:2023cv00922
Petitioner:
Clarence Jones
Respondent:
Deputy Warden Timothy Shoop
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Attorney General for the State of Ohio
as 3:2022cv00352
Petitioner:
Matthew Jones
Respondent:
Attorney General for the State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Black
as 1:2022cv02155
Petitioner:
Shawn-Lamar Jones
Respondent:
Warden Kenneth Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Sullivan
as 3:2022cv02135
Petitioner:
Dashay Jones
Respondent:
Warden Dennis Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
