Cases 1 - 10 of 79
Harmon v. Henderson Case transferred to the Middle District of Tennessee, Nashville Division.
as 3:2024cv01087
Respondent:
Rand Henderson
Petitioner:
Louis Orlando Harmon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Hogan v. Henderson
as 1:2023cv02279
Petitioner:
Tremain Hogan
Respondent:
Warden Kim Henderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
John Coleman v. Kim Henderson
as 23-3938
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN C. COLEMAN
Respondent / Appellee:
KIM HENDERSON, Warden, Toledo Correctional Institution
John Coleman v. Kim Henderson
as 23-3900
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN C. COLEMAN
Respondent / Appellee:
KIM HENDERSON, Warden, Toledo Correctional Institution
Lyons v. Warden Toledo Correctional Institution
as 2:2023cv03532
Petitioner:
Javon Lyons
Defendant:
Warden Kim Henderson
Respondent:
Warden Toledo Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Justin McElroy v. Kim Henderson
as 23-3395
Petitioner / Appellant:
JUSTIN MCELROY
Respondent / Appellee:
KIM HENDERSON, Warden, Toledo Correctional Institution
Foster v. Henderson
as 2:2023cv00947
Petitioner:
Christopher Foster
Respondent:
Kim Henderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Robinson v. Henderson et al
as 3:2023cv00089
Petitioner:
Martin Robinson
Respondent:
Warden Kimberly Henderson, ODRC Director Annette Chamber Smith, Ohio Attorney Genera Mike Dewine and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lawrence v. Henderson
as 1:2022cv02088
Petitioner:
Howard Lawrence
Respondent:
Warden Kim Henderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McDaniel v. Henderson
as 3:2022cv02051
Petitioner:
shannon Mcdaniel
Respondent:
Warden and Warden Kimberly Henderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
