Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Floyd v. Graham-Doaks et al
as 1:2014cv01312
Plaintiff:
Davey Terrell Floyd
Defendant:
Tasma Graham-Doaks, Tracey Howell, Michael Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hatcher v. Light et al
as 2:2014cv00318
Plaintiff:
Shamsiddeen Isiah Hatcher
Defendant:
Gordon Light, Brad Tate, Ginger Crowe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henvey v. Doaks
as 1:2014cv01075
Plaintiff:
Anthony Henvey
Defendant:
Graham Doaks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graham v. Box
as 3:2013cv00779
Plaintiff:
Darnell Graham
Defendant:
O'Shika Box
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gross v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 1:2013cv01075
Plaintiff:
Christopher J Gross
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Graham-Doaks, Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin-Dobson v. Hall et al
as 3:2012cv01146
Plaintiff:
Mark Bryan Martin-Dobson
Defendant:
Daron Hall, Beth Gentry, M. Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neely v. Shinn
as 1:2012cv00357
Plaintiff:
Bobby Gene Neely, Jr.
Defendant:
David L. Shinn, Jr., Sherry Shelton and Thomas W Graham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graham v. Hardin Co. Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2010cv01001
Plaintiff:
Elijah W. Graham
Defendant:
Hardin Co. Correctional Facility, Ned Oldaker and James Strickland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graham v. Hardin Co. Correctional Facility et al
as 3:2010cv00007
Plaintiff:
Elijah W. Graham
Defendant:
Hardin Co. Correctional Facility, Ned Oldaker and James Strickland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manning v. Gibson et al
as 3:2008cv00900
Petitioner:
Paul Graham Manning
Respondent:
William E. Gibson, Benjamin W. Fann, William M. Locke and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
