Cases 31 - 40 of 90
Thomas v. Cox et al
as 1:2015cv01011
Plaintiff:
James Thomas
Defendant:
A. Cox and M. Donahue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. TN Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2015cv01001
Plaintiff:
Corey Alan Bennett
Defendant:
TN Department of Corrections, Law Enforcement Unit, Scott Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wesley v. Management Training Corp. et al
as 3:2014cv02683
Plaintiff:
William Wesley
Defendant:
Management Training Corp., Dr. Stine, Dr. Keeton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Unger v. Management Training Corp. et al
as 3:2014cv02622
Plaintiff:
Shawn R. Unger
Defendant:
Management Training Corp., Dr. Stine, Dr. Keeton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roush v. Talbert et al
as 3:2014cv02490
Plaintiff:
Shane Roush
Defendant:
Al Talbert, Dr. Stine, Dr. Kong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watson v. Corrections Corp. of America et al
as 1:2014cv01307
Plaintiff:
Timothy C. Watson
Defendant:
Corrections Corp. of America, Warden Donahue, Warden Dickerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Donahue et al
as 1:2014cv01281
Plaintiff:
Steven Lamont Anderson
Defendant:
Michael Donahue, Ms. Duncan, Mr. A. Sharp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gardner v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 1:2014cv01257
Plaintiff:
Jack Gardner, III
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Michael Donahue, Brightlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harold Singletary v. Corrections Corporation of Am, et al
as 14-6180
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HAROLD SINGLETARY
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, MICHAEL DONAHUE, HCCF Warden, TERENCE DICKERSON, Assistant Warden and Chief of Operations and others
Corey Bennett v. Goowin, et al
as 14-6021
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COREY ALAN BENNETT
Defendant - Appellee:
GOOWIN, Correctional Officer, CASSADAY, Cheif of Security, SHOUSE, Internal Affairs Investigator and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
