Civil Rights Cases filed in Tennessee
Cases 61 - 70 of 102
Pittman v. Cox et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv01290
Plaintiff: Michael Pittman
Defendant: Chad Cox and Clark and Cox Firm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rector v. Cox et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv00069
Plaintiff: Donnie Lynn Rector
Defendant: Casey Cox and Jeff Shelton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Perry et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv01213
Plaintiff: Ronnie G. Moore
Defendant: Gordon Perry and Alisha Cox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCullough v. Stanley et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv00795
Plaintiff: Michael Wayne McCullough
Defendant: Tim Stavely and Sandra Cox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fisher v. Holloway et al
as 2:2015cv02317
Petitioner: Howard Porter Fisher
Respondent: James Holloway, Dickenson and Cox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Moffitt v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 1:2015cv01115
Plaintiff: Johnny Moffitt
Defendant: Corrections Corporation of America, Michael Donahue, Mitchell Bradshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hairston v. Schofield et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv01054
Plaintiff: James Hairston
Defendant: Derrick Schofield, Jason Woodard, Alicia Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hairston v. Schofield et al
as 3:2015cv00134
Plaintiff: James Hairston
Defendant: Derrick Schofield, Jason Woodard, Alicia Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Cox et al
as 1:2015cv01011
Plaintiff: James Thomas
Defendant: A. Cox and M. Donahue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doss v. Cox et al
as 1:2014cv00367
Plaintiff: LaTaursha Andrews Doss
Defendant: William H Cox, David W Denny, Clarence Shattuck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?