Cases 61 - 70 of 5,093
Bailey v. Jones et al
as 0:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Scott Bailey
Defendant:
Brandon Jones, Nathan Conley and Wesley Coldiron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Knight
as 5:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Cindy Mitchell
Defendant:
David Knight
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Woodford County Detention Center
as 5:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Reginald Kenneth Watson, Jr.
Defendant:
Woodford County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNichols v. Hatton et al
as 5:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Charles R. McNichols
Defendant:
Deputy Warden Chris Hatton, Captain Zackary Eubanks, Warden Bobbi Jo Butts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNichols v. Kentucky Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
Charles R. McNichols
Defendant:
Kentucky Department of Corrections, Bobbi Jo Butts, Chris Hatton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Willet
as 5:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Cindy Mitchell
Defendant:
Officer Willet
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Adams et al
as 3:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
Avren Scott
Defendant:
(Officer) Dylan Adams, (Officer) Gregory A. Stokes, (Officer) Dylan T. Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Whittaker et al
as 1:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Versace Alan Scott
Defendant:
Seth Whittaker and Logan County Sherrif Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Whited et al
as 5:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Ryan Johnson
Defendant:
Chris Whited, Lane Irwin, David Stambaugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pettus v. White et al
as 5:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Alan Michael Pettus
Defendant:
Brent White, Sam Adams, Seth P'pool and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
