Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Davis v. Officer John Doe 1 et al
as 3:2024cv00682
Plaintiff:
Aaron Davis
Defendant:
Officer John Doe 1, Officer John Doe 2, Officer Jane Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Marion County Sherriff's Department et al
as 1:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Bryan R. Phillips
Defendant:
Marion County Sherriff's Department, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Marion County Sherriff's Department et al
as 3:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
Bryan R. Phillips
Defendant:
Marion County Sherriff's Department, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dunlap v. Fish et al
as 3:2023cv00154
Plaintiff:
Joshua Dunlap
Defendant:
Robin Fish, Lakeia Wells, f/n/u Pearson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bosserman v. Doe 1 et al
as 3:2022cv00960
Plaintiff:
Frederick Jason Bosserman
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2, Jane Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dowling v. US Corrections LLC et al
as 1:2020cv00003
Defendant:
John Doe, 2, Knox County, Tennessee, Bauer and others
Plaintiff:
Craig Dowling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shotwell v. Drewery et al
as 2:2019cv02751
Defendant:
Kersey, Phil Drewery, Jr., Jason Drewery and others
Plaintiff:
Roy Shotwell, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tarvin v. Lindamood et al
as 1:2018cv00060
Plaintiff:
Corey Tarvin
Defendant:
Cherry Lindamood, Geneva G. Roberts, Shane McClain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hadnot v. Farrow et al
as 3:2018cv00248
Plaintiff:
Joshua Hadnot
Defendant:
Eric Farrow, Jane Doe, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tarvin v. Lindamood et al
as 1:2018cv00025
Plaintiff:
Corey Tarvin
Defendant:
Cherry Lindamood, Geneva G. Roberts, Shane McClain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
