Cases 1 - 10 of 10
In Re: The Estate of Brian Keith Bennett et al v. Gomez et al
as 6:2022cv00045
In Re:
The Estate of Brian Keith Bennett
Executor:
Wanda Ellen Bennett and Michael Keith Bennett
Defendant:
Warden C. Gomez, John or Jane Doe, John or Jane Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Civil Rights - Bivens Action
Jeffery Carpenter v. Central Office Classification Comm, et al
as 22-5024
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFERY L. CARPENTER
Defendant / Appellee:
CENTRAL OFFICE CLASSIFICATION COMMITTEE, ALAN D. LONG, KIERYN FANNIN and others
Wooley v. Jordan et al
as 5:2021cv00142
Plaintiff:
Corey Eugene Wooley
Defendant:
Scott Jordan, Department of Corrections, Garth Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayes v. Acree et al
as 5:2021cv00171
Defendant:
Judge Lindsay H. Thurston and Patrol A. Acree
Plaintiff:
Richie Elzander Mayes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayes v. Lexington Fayette Urban Co et al
as 5:2021cv00013
Defendant:
Government Community Corrections, Lexington Fayette Urban Co, Sheriff Boston and others
Plaintiff:
Richie Elzander Mayes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. John Jane Doe PCI et al
as 2:2020cv05599
Plaintiff:
Robert Martin
Defendant:
Dr Dagil, PCI Cashier Endicott, MD at PCI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayes v. Commonwealth of Kentucky
as 5:2016cv00405
Petitioner:
Richie E. Mayes
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mayes v. Lexington Metro Police Department et al
as 5:2016cv00366
Plaintiff:
Richie E. Mayes
Defendant:
Lexington Metro Police Department and Delimpo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayes v. Commonwealth of Kentucky et al
as 5:2012cv00042
Plaintiff:
Richie Elzander Mayes
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Kentucky, Bonnie K. Potter and Angela Denise Redwine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Halt et al
as 4:2007cv02052
Defendant:
Carl Halt, Fitzgerald, Temple and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
