Cases 41 - 50 of 52
Vandagriff v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 6:2010cv00225
Petitioner:
Jerry Vandagriff
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Karen F. Hogsten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Taylor et al v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 6:2010cv00011
Petitioner:
Dave Andrae Taylor
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Eric D. Wilson, Linda Gregory and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pike v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 7:2009cv00088
Plaintiff:
Aaron B. Pike
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 6:2009cv00107
Petitioner:
Antoine Thomas Washington
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Karen Hogsten
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Brown v. United States of America et al
as 6:2009cv00075
Petitioner:
Anthony F. Brown
Respondent:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons and Karen Hogsten
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Cox v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 6:2008cv00382
Petitioner:
Welby Thomas Cox
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Karen Hogsten
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Nunez v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 7:2008cv00201
Plaintiff:
Rene Nunez
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Harley Lappin, Kim White and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Demonbreum v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 7:2008cv00198
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Demonbreum
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Pablo Cruz, Sloan and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Cohen v. Dewalt et al
as 5:2008cv00288
Petitioner:
Leslie Charles Cohen
Respondent:
Stephen M. Dewalt, Marvin Pitt, C. Oldham and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Embry v. USA et al
as 6:2008cv00152
Plaintiff:
Alford Darrel Embry, Jr.
Defendant:
USA, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Brad Crow and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
