Cases 21 - 30 of 359
Brooks v. City of Columbia
as 1:2023cv00035
Plaintiff:
Roy Brooks
Defendant:
City of Columbia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Hearon v. K-VA-T Food Stores, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00155
Plaintiff:
Kendra Leigh Hearon
Defendant:
K-VA-T Food Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Hager v. CMH Manufacturing, Inc.
as 2:2022cv00154
Plaintiff:
Katrina Hager
Defendant:
CMH Manufacturing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Moore v. Mount Zion Baptist Church
as 3:2022cv00965
Plaintiff:
Kiara Moore
Defendant:
Mount Zion Baptist Church
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Garrison v. Life Bridges, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00233
Plaintiff:
Charity Garrison
Defendant:
Life Bridges, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Graybeal v. Shiroki North America, Inc.
as 2:2022cv00041
Plaintiff:
Richard Graybeal
Defendant:
Shiroki North America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Moore v. Bells Nursing Home, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01173
Plaintiff:
Renita Moore
Defendant:
Bells Nursing Home, Inc. doing business as Bells Nursing & Rehabilitation Center and Harber-Laman, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615 a Family Medical Leave Act
Hunt v. McNairy County Board of Education
as 1:2022cv01135
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Hunt
Defendant:
McNairy County Board of Education
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2615 a Family Medical Leave Act
Bartol v. City of Chattanooga
as 1:2022cv00152
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BARTOL
Defendant:
City of Chattanooga
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Brown v. Commercial Insurance Associates, LLC
as 3:2022cv00377
Plaintiff:
Regina Brown
Defendant:
Commercial Insurance Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
