Cases 21 - 30 of 377
Gasca E. de los M. v. Michigan Department of Civil Rights
as 2:2023cv10683
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Gasca E. de los M.
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Civil Rights
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Walton v. First Merchants Corp. et al
as 2:2023cv10404
Plaintiff:
Deborah Walton and Deborah Walton [E-filer]
Defendant:
First Merchants Corp. and Brian T. Hunt
Lally v Whitmer
as 4:2023cv10044
Plaintiff:
Mr. Michael Robert Lally and Michael Robert Lally
Defendant:
Governor Gretchen E. Whitmer, Joseph M. Gasper and Heidi E Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Houston et al v. US Department of Justice et al
as 2:2022cv13036
Plaintiff:
Sean Houston, Romaine Kristini Davenport Trust and Sean Houston [E-filer]
Defendant:
US Department of Justice, US Department of Treasury, US Department of Interior and others
E. C. v. Choice Hotels International, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv03811
Plaintiff:
E. C.
Defendant:
Choice Hotels International, Inc., G6 Hospitality, LLC, Red Roof Inns, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Consolidated Industries, LLC d/b/a Weather King Portable Buildings v. Maupin et al
as 1:2022cv01230
Plaintiff:
Consolidated Industries, LLC d/b/a Weather King Portable Buildings
Defendant:
Jesse A. Maupin, Adrian S. Harrod, Logan C. Feagin and others
Petitioner:
Troy Buttrey and BPS, LLC
Carol McBratnie v. Charles Rettig, et al
as 22-1915
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CAROL ANN MCBRATNIE
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLES PAUL RETTIG, IRS Commissioner, MARY BETH MURPHY, Former Commissioner SB/SE Unit, MAURICE B. FOLEY, Chief Justice US Tax Court and others
Smith v. Forsythe Finance LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00556
Plaintiff:
Marcie Smith
Defendant:
Forsythe Finance LLC, Law Offices of Timothy M Sullivan, Jeffrey L Koberg and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
