Cases 51 - 60 of 94
Rogers v. Battles et al
as 2:2016cv13857
Plaintiff:
Samuel C. Rogers
Defendant:
John Battles and Laverna D. Ricks
Hatch et al v. Ditech Financial, LLC
as 1:2016cv01252
Plaintiff:
Roger Hatch and Sandy Hatch
Defendant:
Ditech Financial, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
PLETOS v. MAKOWER ABATTE GUERRA WEGNER VOLLER et al
as 2:2016cv13175
Plaintiff:
SANDRA PLETOS and MITCHELL PLETOS
Defendant:
MAKOWER ABATTE GUERRA WEGNER VOLLER , JOHN FINKELMANN , ROGER PAPA and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Rogers v. Michigan Attorney General et al
as 2:2016cv12509
Plaintiff:
Samuel C. Rogers
Defendant:
Michigan Attorney General, Michigan Tenure Commission and Michigan Friend of the Courts
Armstrong v. Michigan Bureau of Services for Blind Persons et al
as 1:2016cv00345
Plaintiff:
Sheila Armstrong
Defendant:
Michigan Bureau of Services for Blind Persons, Edward Rogers, II, Tamela Meek and others
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 107
Rogers v. Michigan, State of et al
as 2:2016cv11155
Plaintiff:
Samuel C. Rogers
Defendant:
Michigan, State of and Michigan Friend of the Court
Rogers v. State of Michigan Circuit Court
as 5:2016cv10136
Plaintiff:
Samuel Rogers
Defendant:
State of Michigan Circuit Court
Rogers v. Crawford et al
as 5:2016cv10063
Defendant:
William Crawford, Michael J. Thelie, John Bottles and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel C. Rogers
Rogers v. Michigan Judicial Tenure Commission et al
as 2:2015cv14211
Plaintiff:
Samuel C. Rogers
Defendant:
Michigan Judicial Tenure Commission, Attorney Grievance Commission and Michigan Friend of Court
Key et al v. Integrity Surveillance Solutions, Inc. d/b/a Integ Security Solutions
as 5:2015cv11235
Plaintiff:
Roger Key and Janet Gajewski
Defendant:
Integrity Surveillance Solutions, Inc. d/b/a Integ Security Solutions
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
