Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Maurice Glover v. Lee Thompson, et al
as 22-1785
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAURICE GLOVER
Defendant / Appellee:
LEE A. THOMPSON, individually and in his offical capacity as former District Manager of the United States Postal Office, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, MEGAN J. BRENNAN, Individually and in her official capacity as Former Postmaster General/Chief Executive Officer and others
Childs v. United States of America et al
as 2:2020cv13094
Defendant:
Ryan Neighbots, United States of America and United States Postal Service
Plaintiff:
Glenn Vincent Childs
Glover v. Thompson et al
as 1:2020cv10313
Defendant:
Megan J. Brennan, United States Postal Service and Lee A. Thompson
Plaintiff:
Maurice Glover
Freeman v. United States Postal Service
as 2:2018cv12246
Plaintiff:
Seydou Freeman
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Anderson v. United States Postal Service
as 1:2017cv00125
Plaintiff:
Anthony Anderson
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Amine v. United States of America et al
as 2:2016cv14414
Defendant:
United States of America and The United States Postal Service
Plaintiff:
Nabila Amine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Hood v. United States of America et al
as 1:2015cv01247
Plaintiff:
Julian R. Hood, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Group Five Management Co. v. Mendez et al
as 1:2014cv01130
Plaintiff:
Group Five Management Co.
Defendant:
Maria Mendez
Garnishee:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Go Load Trucking v. USPS
as 13-5766
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GO LOAD TRUCKING
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Go Load Trucking v. U.S. Postal Service
as 3:2012cv00864
Plaintiff:
Go Load Trucking
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
