Cases 41 - 50 of 873
Doe #1 (PTH) et al v. Lee et al
as 3:2023cv00967
Plaintiff:
John Doe #1 (PTH), John Doe #2 (DMA), John Doe #3 (WCB) and others
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Antonio Fluker, Jr. v. Gary Carr, et al
as 23-1921
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTONIO LYNN FLUKER, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
GARY CARR, Vice President, Financial Crimes and FIFTH THIRD BANK
Doe (OA) v. Lee et al
as 3:2023cv00941
Plaintiff:
John Doe (OA) and Anthony Oliver
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Rausch (JRG3)
as 1:2023cv00180
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Merrilee Stewart v. Kim Brown, et al
as 23-3690
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MERRILEE STEWART
Defendant / Appellee:
JUDGE KIM J. BROWN, Franklin County Common Pleas Court and DAVE YOST, Ohio Attorney General
Doe (ADD) v. Lee et al
as 3:2023cv00943
Plaintiff:
John Doe (ADD)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Doe (GEA.1) v. Lee et al
as 3:2023cv00834
Plaintiff:
John Doe (GEA.1)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Doe (RB) v. Lee et al
as 3:2023cv00877
Plaintiff:
John Doe (RB)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #1 (MSA) et al v. Lee et al
as 3:2023cv00784
Plaintiff:
John Doe #1 (MSA) and John Doe #2 (TRB)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Motorist Commercial Mutual Insurance Company v. Tom Drexler Plumbing, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00416
Plaintiff:
Motorist Commercial Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
Tom Drexler Plumbing, Inc., Tom Drexler Plumbing LLC, Diane Snedden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
