Cases 1 - 8 of 8
SECURA Insurance v. Kiel Thomson Company et al
as 3:2017cv00581
Plaintiff:
SECURA Insurance
Defendant:
Kiel Thomson Company , Kevin McLaughlin and Amy McLaughlin
Counter_claimant:
Kiel Thomson Company
Counter_defendant:
SECURA Insurance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
John Thomson, et al v. Hartford Casualty Insurance C
as 15-1501
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN N. THOMSON, Co-Trustee, JULIA KASSAK, Co-Trustee, Beneficiary, SILVERIO J. VITELLO, Beneficiary and others
Defendant - Appellee:
HARTFORD CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Thomson Reuters (Tax & Accounting), Inc. v. Vargas
as 2:2015cv11331
Plaintiff:
Thomson Reuters (Tax & Accounting), Inc.
Defendant:
Casilda Vargas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Koning & Jilek P.C. et al v. Thomson Reuters Holdings Inc.et al
as 1:2014cv00532
Plaintiff:
James H. Koning and Koning & Jilek P.C.
Defendant:
FindLaw and Thomson Reuters Holdings Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Thomson et al v. Hartford Casualty Insurance Company
as 2:2013cv10863
Plaintiff:
John N. Thomson , Julia Kassak , Silverio J Vitello and others
Defendant:
Hartford Casualty Insurance Company
Ferris & Salter, PC v. Thomson Reuters Corporation
as 2:2011cv12448
Plaintiff:
FERRIS and SALTER, P.C.
Defendant:
THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Suresh Dakshinamoorthy v. National Association of Boards, et al
as 11-1644
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SURESH DAKSHINAMOORTHY, R.PH.
Defendant - Appellee:
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BOARDS OF PHARMACY and CARMEN CATIZONE
Defendant:
PROMETRIC, EDUCATIONAL TESTING SERVICE and THOMSON REUTERS CORP.
Dakshinamoorthy v. National Association of Boards of Pharmacy, et al.
as 2:2009cv11129
Defendant:
National Association of Boards of Pharmacy, Carmen Catizone, Prometric, Incorporated and others
Plaintiff:
Suresh Dakshinamoorthy
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
