Cases 21 - 30 of 150
Graminex, L. L. C. v. Roelmi HPC, s.r.l. et al
as 1:2018cv10372
Plaintiff:
Graminex, L. L. C.
Defendant:
Roelmi HPC, s.r.l., Principium BSI, s.r.l. and RO.EL.MI DS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Capital C Consulting LLC v. Ohio Care + Wellness LLC
as 2:2017cv00991
Plaintiff:
Capital C Consulting LLC
Defendant:
Ohio Care + Wellness LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Hibbeler v. Pearson Education, Inc.
as 3:2017cv00945
Plaintiff:
Russell C. Hibbeler
Defendant:
Pearson Education, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101
Hawthorn v. Selke et al
as 3:2016cv00246
Plaintiff:
James C Hawthorn
Defendant:
Sarah L Selke, Atelier Design LLC and Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504
Hawthorn v. Selke et al
as 3:2016oe00245
Petitioner:
James C Hawthorn
Defendant:
Sarah L Selke, Atelier Design LLC and Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504
Hawthorn v. Selke et al
as 3:2016cv00245
Petitioner:
James C Hawthorn
Defendant:
Sarah L Selke, Atelier Design LLC and Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504
North Atlantic Operating Company, Inc., et al v. Scott, et al
as 4:2016cv12076
Plaintiff:
North Atlantic Operating Company, Inc. and National Tobacco Company, L.P.
Defendant:
Walter C Scott, Ebay Seller Respect843, NIR BISWA and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Reiner v. Saginaw Valley State University et al
as 1:2016cv11728
Plaintiff:
T. C. Reiner
Defendant:
Saginaw Valley State University and Board of Control Saginaw Valley State University
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Davis v. Williams et al
as 3:2016cv00686
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah C. Davis
Defendant:
Hayley N. Williams , Taylor B. York , Mark Mercado and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101
Sewell v. Richardson et al
as 2:2016cv00069
Defendant:
Brandon C Richardson and Stephanie R Richardson
Plaintiff:
Kenneth R Sewell
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
