Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Evans v. Summit Hill Foods Inc
as 2:2023cv04149
Plaintiff:
Charles R Evans
Defendant:
Summit Hill Foods Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Calvary Industries, Inc. v. Winters et al
as 1:2023cv00001
Plaintiff:
CALVARY INDUSTRIES, INC.
Defendant:
Jonathan K Winters, Jim Epstein, Evan Epstein and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Easterly et al v. Hartkop
as 1:2020cv01546
Petitioner:
Evan Graham, Wesley Easterly and Christopher Joecken
Defendant:
Nick Hartkop
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rogers et al v. Kroger Co.(THE) et al
as 2:2018cv02882
Defendant:
Kroger Co.(THE), Kroger Limited Partnership I and Kroger Store #393
Plaintiff:
Caleb Evans and Taylor Rogers
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Rogers et al v. Kroger Co.(THE) et al
as 2:2017cv02753
Plaintiff:
Taylor Rogers , Caleb Evans and J. J. E.
Defendant:
Kroger Co.(THE) and Kroger Limited Partnership I
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Devnani v. DMK Solutions, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv10810
Plaintiff:
Ravi Devnani
Defendant:
DMK Solutions, Inc., Jeff Grazioplene and Samuel Evans
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Walsh v. Evans and Associates Consulting Corporation
as 2:2014cv11584
Plaintiff:
Robert S Walsh
Defendant:
Evans and Associates Consulting Corporation
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Daigre et al v. Lacy
as 3:2013cv00398
Plaintiff:
Alan Daigre and Matthew Teague
Defendant:
Evan Lacy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Trademark Infringement
Cherryhill Management, Inc. v. Wood Herron & Evans, L.L.P.
as 1:2012cv00955
Plaintiff:
Cherryhill Management, Inc.
Defendant:
Wood Herron & Evans, L.L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Slep-Tone Entertainment Corporation v. Arrowood et al
as 2:2010cv00592
Plaintiff:
Slep-Tone Entertainment Corporation
Defendant:
Luke F. Arrowood, Kim Arrowood, Steve Searl and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
