Cases 31 - 40 of 5,352
Gross v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Tracy Gross
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA-Email Notification
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Heckert v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Bonnie Heckert
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Email Notification
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Daugherty v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00290
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Stanley Daugherty
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Anglian v. SSA
as 6:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Candace Mae Anglian
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Anderson v. SSA
as 6:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Jennifer L. Anderson
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Carter v. SSA
as 5:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Maurice Carter
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Szudejko v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00151
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Matthew Szudejko
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Kinstle v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00088
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Jason Kinstle
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Murton v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00084
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Gregory Murton
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Sigmon v. SSA
as 0:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Shade A. Sigmon
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
