Cases 91 - 100 of 108
Tibbs et al v. Sebelius et al
as 2:2009cv00773
Plaintiff:
Clark Tibbs and Phagevax Inc
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius, Nicole Lurie, Nancy J Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 247 Personal Injury-Swine Flu
Willis v. Doe, et al
as 2:2009cv13406
Plaintiff:
Gregory Willis
Defendant:
John Doe and Jim Graham
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Type:
Other Statutes
In Re: Home Services of Americ
as 08-517
Petitioner:
CENTURY 21 REAL ESTATE LLC, fka Century 21 Real Estate Corporation, COLDWELL BAKER REAL ESTATE CORPORATION, COLDWELL BANKER MCMAHAN COMPANY and others
Respondent:
CASEY WILLIAM HYLAND, GRAHAM PULLEN, CHRISTOPHER R. BURNETTE and others
USA v. Lashawn Graham
as 08-4520
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
LASHAWN GRAHAM
Manning v. Gibson et al
as 3:2008mc00227
Plaintiff:
Paul Graham Manning
Defendant:
William E. Gibson, Benjamin W. Fann, William M. Locke and others
USA v. Johnny Graham
as 08-6082
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHNNY GRAHAM
USA v. Donald Graham
as 08-5993
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DONALD L. GRAHAM
Ahr et al v. Raymond James & Associates, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00507
Plaintiff:
Lynn A. Ahr, Lynn A. Ahr, Donna L. Diewald and others
Defendant:
Raymond James & Associates, Inc., Raymond James & Associates, Inc., Raymond James & Associates, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Brumlow v. Walmart et al
as 2:2008cv00714
Plaintiff:
Bobby Brumlow
Defendant:
Walmart, Mary Brumlow, Sandy Chapplle and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Graham v. Manley Deas Kochalski, LLC et al
as 2:2008cv00120
Plaintiff:
Vevie Jennine Graham and Frederick M. Luper
Defendant:
Manley Deas Kochalski, LLC, Kevin L. Williams, Washington Mutual Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
