Cases 101 - 110 of 255
Sanzotta et al v. The City of Ann Arbor et al
as 2:2016cv10007
Plaintiff:
Sabra Sanzotta , Jerome Huez , Philip Ristenbatt and others
Defendant:
The City of Ann Arbor , Christopher Taylor , Steven D Powers and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Mattingly v. Breckinridge County Jail et al
as 3:2015cv00792
Plaintiff:
Robert Mattingly
Defendant:
Breckinridge County Jail, Tara Shrewsberry, Josh Neal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arnold et al v. Department of Veterans Affairs
as 3:2015cv00380
Plaintiff:
Angelo B Arnold , Zandra L Arnold , Charles Davis and others
Defendant:
Department of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Dish Network, LLC v. Fields et al
as 6:2015cv00153
Plaintiff:
Dish Network, LLC
Defendant:
James L. Fields, Daniel Boone Motor Inn, Inc. and John and Jane Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nevada-Martinez et al v. Ahmad et al
as 5:2015cv00239
Plaintiff:
Porfirio Nevada-Martinez , Carlos Alberto Macias-Ramirez , John and Jane Does and others
Defendant:
Weal Ahmad , Anna Garcia and Ahmad Law Office, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01561
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01544
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01357
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Charles v. Winchester et al
as 6:2015cv00113
Plaintiff:
Betty Charles
Defendant:
Merril A. Winchester, Winchester, Patton and Burgess, P.S.C., McCreary Christian Center, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
