Cases 11 - 20 of 107
Michael Alf, et al v. The Ohio State University
as 21-4070
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL ALF, GARY TILL, ALLEN NOVAKOWSKI and others
Defendant / Appellee:
THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY
USA v. Ronald Armstrong
as 21-5690
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RONALD ARMSTRONG
Michael Gorbe, et al v. City of Lathrup Village, MI, et al
as 21-1532
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM ARMSTRONG, SCOTT MCKEE and CITY OF LATHRUP VILLAGE, MI
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TYRON RUCKER and MICHAEL GORBE
PB&J Towing Serv I & II, LLC v. Samuel Hines, et al
as 20-6170
Defendant / Appellee:
KAREN ARMSTRONG, Individually and as Member of Memphis Police Department board, DEBRA STREETER, Individually and as Member of Memphis Police Department board, SAMUEL HINES, Individually and as Commander of Traffic/Special Operations Division of the Memphis Police Department and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PB&J TOWING SERVICE I & II, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00789
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Jacob ArmstrongIn re: Jacob Armstrong
as 20-5892
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
In re: JACOB WADE ARMSTRONG, aka Jake Armstrong
Armstrong Steamship Company v. Batain
as 2:2020cv11486
Defendant:
Ida Batain
Plaintiff:
Armstrong Steamship Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Bob Post v. City of Munroe Falls, OH, et al
as 20-3458
Defendant / Appellant:
CITY OF MUNROE FALLS, OH, JAMES ARMSTRONG, JERRY HUGHES and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BOB POST
USA v. Robert Jordan, III, et al
as 19-4127
Defendant / Appellee:
RICO ARMSTRONG and ROBERT JORDAN, III
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Sheila Armstrong v. MI Bureau of Serv for Blind, et al
as 19-2179
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN KING, JR., JAMES HULL, EDWARD ROGERS, II and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHEILA ARMSTRONG
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
