Cases 31 - 40 of 54
In re: David W. Noblit, et al
as 13-6215
Debtor:
In re: NELSON E. BOWERS, II
Appellant:
NELSON E. BOWERS, II
Appellee:
RICHARD L. BANKS, ANDREW B. MORGAN, RICHARD BANKS & ASSOCIATES, PC and others
Hollins et al v. The Janitorial Agency Corp. et al
as 1:2013cv00745
Plaintiff:
Walter Hollins , Kemondie Patterson and Rosa Pizzo
Defendant:
The Janitorial Agency Corp., The Janitorial Agency Franchise Systems Corp., The Janitorial Agency Services Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
In re: Mitchell Bower
as 13-5532
Movant:
In re: MITCHELL BOWERS
Respondent:
NWCX WARDEN HENRY STEWARD
In re: Michael Bowers, et al
as 13-8014
Debtor:
In re: MICHAEL ALLEN BOWERS and MARGARITA VILLE BOWERS
In re: Windstream Kentucky East, LLC, et al
as 12-508
Petitioner:
WINDSTREAM KENTUCKY EAST, LLC and WINDSTREAM KENTUCKY WEST, LLC
Respondent:
DANA BOWERS and SUNRISE CHILDREN'S SERVICES, INC., on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated
USA v. Anthony Bower
as 12-5796
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ANTHONY BOWERS
USA v. Vance Bower
as 10-6449
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
VANCE BOWERS
Allan et al v. Realcomp II, Ltd. et al
as 2:2010cv14046
Plaintiff:
Eugene Allan , Deborah F. Allan , Matthew J Cavendish and others
Defendant:
Realcomp II, Ltd., Dearborn Board of Realtors, Detroit Association of Realtors and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Allan et al v. Realcomp II, Ltd. et al
as 4:2010cv14046
Plaintiff:
Eugene Allan , Deborah F. Allan , Matthew J Cavendish and others
Defendant:
Realcomp II, Ltd. , Dearborn Board of Realtors , Detroit Association of Realtors and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Hoskins v. Aramark Food Services et al
as 3:2010mc00024
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Hoskins
Defendant:
Aramark Food Services, Shelby County Justice Center, Mark Luttrell and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
