Other Statutes Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 2,875
BATES et al v. MAYORKAS et al
as 1:2024cv00038
Plaintiff: MITCHELL BRIAN BATES and NOEMI P. DAGAMI
Defendant: The Honorable Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou and Merrick B. Garland
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Leonel Bonilla-Cruz v. Merrick Garland
as 24-3290
Petitioner: LEONEL IVAN BONILLA-CRUZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Alma Garcia-Melgar, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 24-3276
Petitioner: ALMA YESSICA GARCIA-MELGAR and ANGEL SANTIAGO GARCIA-MELGAR
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Doe #1 (ELA) et al v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00361
Plaintiff: John Doe #1 (ELA), John Doe #2 (BMA), John Doe #3 (RNB) and others
Defendant: William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marty MillerIn re: Marty Miller
as 24-1261
Petitioner: In re: MARTY B. MILLER
Respondent: BRYAN MORRISON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00313
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Island Creek Coal Company v. OWCP, et al
as 24-3244
Petitioner: ISLAND CREEK COAL COMPANY
Respondent: DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, DARLENE H. HUGHES, o/b/o Billy Ray Hughes, decd. and BENEFITS REVIEW BOARD
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00327
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
Felaciano Garcia-Severiano v. Merrick Garland
as 24-3227
Petitioner: FELACIANO GARCIA-SEVERIANO
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Jorge Melgoza-Perez v. Merrick Garland
as 24-3225
Petitioner: JORGE HUMBERTO MELGOZA-PEREZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?