Cases 41 - 50 of 295
Wayne LaFountain v. Randee Rewerts
as 21-1194
Petitioner / Appellant:
WAYNE EARL LAFOUNTAIN
Respondent / Appellee:
RANDEE REWERTS, Warden
Earl Truss, Jr. v. Heidi Washington, et al
as 21-1153
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EARL FLYNN TRUSS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
DEPUTY DIRECTOR DENNIS M. STRAUB, Warden, Michigan Department of Corrections and DIRECTOR HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, Michigan Department of Corrections
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00017
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
USA v. Michael Davis
as 20-4333
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL EARL DAVIS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In re: Earl Davis
as 20-2208
Respondent:
MIKE BROWN, Acting Warden
Petitioner:
In re: EARL DEMETRIUS DAVIS
Earl Anderson v. John Hairabedian, et al
as 20-4177
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL BRANDEL, individually and in his/her official capacity as Unit Sergeant/Corrections Counselor-ToCI, MARSHAL KLAVINGER, individually and in his/her official capacity as Unit Sergeant/Correctional Counselor, ROBERT COPELY, individually and in his/her official capacity as Lieutenant Supervisor-ToCI and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EARL ANDERSON
Heritage Coal Company v. OWCP, et al
as 20-4164
Petitioner:
HERITAGE COAL COMPANY, Self-insured by Peabody Energy Corporation
Respondent:
EARL NELSON, BENEFITS REVIEW BOARD and DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Tommy Jones v. Donald Willie, et al
as 20-6235
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TOMMY EARL JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
DONALD WILLIE, Family Nurse Practitioner at the WTSP and LYNETTE WILLIAMS
Keller North America, Inc. v. Earl et al
as 1:2020cv02401
Defendant:
Jeremy Earl, Donald Ray Williams, Josh Senk and others
Plaintiff:
Keller North America, Inc.
USA v. Robert Wallace
as 20-6181
Defendant / Appellant:
ROBERT EARL WALLACE
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
