Cases 41 - 50 of 56
USA v. Darryl Stevenson
as 10-6510
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DARRYL K. STEVENSON
Stevenson v. Helton et al
as 1:2010mc00006
Plaintiff:
Darryl Stevenson
Defendant:
Less Helton and Sheriff and Municipalities Marshall County
Michigan Surgery Investment, et al v. Arman, et al
as 10-1612
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHIGAN SURGERY INVESTMENT, LLC, VEI - MICHIGAN, INC. and VISIONARY ENTERPRISES, INC., fka Voluntary Enterprises, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee:
MOHAMMED ARMAN, CARL T. BERGREN, RICARDO D. BORREGO and others
Defendant:
OAKWOOD ENTERPRISES, INC. and OAKWOOD HEALTHCARE, INC.
USA v. Derick Stevenson
as 10-1043
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
DERICK STEVENSON
Michigan Surgery Investment, LLC et al v. Arman et al
as 2:2009cv14656
Plaintiff:
Michigan Surgery Investment, LLC, VEI - Michigan, Inc., Visionary Enterprises, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Mohammed Arman, Carl T. Bergren, Ricardo D. Borrego and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Type:
Other Statutes
Stevenson v. Long et al
as 3:2009mc00220
Plaintiff:
Darryl Stevenson
Defendant:
Jeff Long and Southern Health Partners
Burnett v. Highland Park, City of et al
as 2:2009cv14238
Plaintiff:
Veretta Burnett and Veretta Burnett
Defendant:
Highland Park, City of and Brenda Stevenson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Type:
Other Statutes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00765
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Stevenson v. Scutt
as 2:2009cv13358
Petitioner:
Adrian Stevenson
Respondent:
Debra Scutt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Type:
Other Statutes
United States of America v. Stevenson
as 2:2009cr20309
Defendant:
Brenda Stevenson
Plaintiff:
United States of America and United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
