Cases 41 - 46 of 46
Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters' Employee Benefits Fund et al v. Gorden Satterla Carpentry, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv13145
Plaintiff:
Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters' Employee Benefits Fund, Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters' Annuity Fund, Carpenters' Pension Trust Fund - Detroit and Vicinity and others
Defendant:
Gorden Satterla Carpentry, Inc. and Gorden Satterla
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 1101 E.R.I.S.A.
Type:
Other Statutes
Board of Trustees of the Pipe Fitters Retirement Fund et al v. Piping Technologies, Inc et al
as 1:2008mc00091
Plaintiff:
Local 597 Board of Trustees of the Pipe Fitters Retirement Fund, Local 597 Board of Trustees of the Pipe Fitters Welfare Fund, Local 597 Board of Trustees of the Pipe Fitters Training Fund and others
Defendant:
Piping Technologies, Inc, B. Paul Golden and Southwind Building Group
Michigan Laborers' Pension Fund et al v. Bales Incorporated et al
as 3:2008mc00054
Plaintiff:
Michigan Laborers' Pension Fund, Michigan Laborers' Pension Fund, Michigan Laborers' Pension Fund and others
Defendant:
Bales Incorporated, Howard M Bales and Timothy J Ryan
In Re: Rocwall Company, et al
as 08-104
Petitioner:
In re: ROCWALL COMPANY
Respondent:
LABORERS PENSION TRUST FUND - DETROIT AND VICINITY, Trustees of, LABORERS VACATION AND HOLIDAY TRUST FUND, DETROIT AND VICINITY, Trustees of, LABORERS AND POURED CONCRETE WORKERS INSURANCE FUND and others
Buffalo Laborers Welfare Fund et al v. Cavalier Construction & Industrial Corp.
as 1:2008mc00019
Plaintiff:
Buffalo Laborers Welfare Fund, Buffalo Laborers Pension Fund, Buffalo Laborers Training Fund and others
Defendant:
Cavalier Construction & Industrial Corp.
Trustees of the Plumbers and Pipefitters National Pension Fund et al v. Pickaway Process Piping Inc
as 2:2007mc00011
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Plumbers and Pipefitters National Pension Fund and Trustees of the International Training Fund
Defendant:
Pickaway Process Piping Inc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
