Cases 51 - 60 of 103
USA v. David Pierce
as 15-5166
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID L. PIERCE
In re: In Re; HCA Holdings, Inc.
as 14-511
Petitioner:
In re: HCA HOLDINGS, INC., RICHARD M. BRACKEN, R. JOHNSON and others
Respondent:
KARSTEN SCHUH and NEW ENGLAND TEAMSTERS & TRUCKING INDUSTRY PENSION FUND
Rosenberg v. Cliffs Natural Resources Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv01531
Defendant:
Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Andres R Gluski, Richard A. Ross and others
Petitioner:
Department of the Treasury of the State of New Jersey and its Division of Investment
Plaintiff:
Stuart Rosenberg
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated v. Warren
as 5:2014cv00233
Plaintiff:
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated
Defendant:
Eric Warren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Heit v. Pierce et al
as 2:2014cv11152
Plaintiff:
Richard T Heit
Defendant:
Lynne A Pierce, Kimberly L McDade and Carmen R Lyon
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Universal Health Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv10266
Plaintiff:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Defendant:
Universal Health Group, Inc. , UHG Management, LLC , Professional Health Systems, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Allstate Insurance Company et al v. Universal Health Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv15108
Plaintiff:
Allstate Insurance Company , Allstate Indemnity Company and Allstate Property & Casualty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Universal Health Group, Inc., Professional Health Systems, LLC, Health Systems, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Aaron et al v. Medtronic Inc et al
as 1:2013cv00301
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc. and Medtronic Sofamor Danek, USA, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Frieda Aaron , Katrina Allen , Rebecca Applegate and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Racketeering (RICO)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
