Cases 71 - 80 of 132
Freeman v. Davis et al
as 2:2012mc00001
Plaintiff:
Todd L. Freeman
Defendant:
Jordan Davis and Beth Brook Davis
Anfinson v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC et al
as 2:2012cv00152
Plaintiff:
Monica J Anfinson and Jerry R Anfinson
Defendant:
Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC, Elaine Freeman-Lark and McLemore & Edington, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
USA v. William Freeman
as 12-1355
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
WILLIAM ANTHONY FREEMAN
Halo Wireless, Inc. v. The Tennessee Regulatory Authority et al
as 3:2012cv00302
Plaintiff:
Halo Wireless, Inc.
Defendant:
Tennessee Regulatory Authority , Kenneth C. Hill , Mary W. Freeman and others
Intervenor:
BellSouth Telecommunications, LLC
Intervenor_defendant:
Concord Telephone Exchange, Inc. , Humphreys County Telephone Co. , Tellico Telephone Company and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0252
In re: James Freeman
as 12-5070
Movant:
In re: JAMES F. FREEMAN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Freeman v. Morristown-Hamblen Hospital Association et al
as 2:2012cv00011
Plaintiff:
Joseph Freeman
Defendant:
Morristown-Hamblen Hospital Association , CBET, Inc. and Kari Nicole Harkleroad
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv10065
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
USA v. Willie Freeman
as 11-6485
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
WILLIE A. FREEMAN
Daniels v. HCA Holdings, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv01170
Plaintiff:
Julius Daniels
Defendant:
HCA Holdings, Inc. , Richard M. Bracken , R. Milton Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Kishtah v. HCA Holdings, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv01098
Plaintiff:
Rafat Kishtah
Defendant:
HCA Holdings, Inc. , Richard M. Bracken , R. Milton Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
