Cases 1 - 10 of 61
Gutierrez Macias v. Jiminez Inerarity
as 1:2024cv00237
Petitioner:
Yunisaday Gutierrez Macias
Respondent:
Jose Fernando Jimenez Inerarity and Jose Fernando Jiminez Inerarity
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11601 International Child Abduction Remedies Act
USA v. Luis Salazar Angeles
as 23-3981
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
LUIS FERNANDO SALAZAR ANGELES
USA v. Luis Lara-Garcia
as 23-5735
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
LUIS FERNANDO LARA-GARCIA
Fernando Reynoso Domingo v. Merrick Garland
as 23-3228
Petitioner:
FERNANDO BALDOMERO REYNOSO DOMINGO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Luis Cisneros-Galvez v. Merrick Garland
as 23-3193
Petitioner:
LUIS FERNANDO CISNEROS-GALVEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Cervantes Vargas et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2022cv01052
Plaintiff:
Maria Myrna Cervantes Vargas, Fernando Aurelio Juarico Morales and Porfirio Hugo Juarico Morales
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou, Laura B. Zuchowski and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Jennifer Rodriguez-Cuevas, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 22-3234
Petitioner:
JENNIFER YAMALI RODRIGUEZ-CUEVAS, GEREMY ANTONIO ACOSTA-RODRIGUEZ and MATTEW FERNANDO RODRIGUEZ-CUEVAS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Emma Soto-Mejia, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 22-3213
Petitioner:
EMMA YAMILETH SOTO-MEJIA, FERNANDO JOSUE ANARIBA-SOTO and JUNIOR JAVIER ANARIBA-SOTO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01044
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01039
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
