Cases 1 - 10 of 61
Schwartz v. Armadura
as 1:2024cv00405
Plaintiff:
Michael Schwartz
Defendant:
Armadura doing business as Federal Tax Law Group Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Capital S Investment Company Inc. et al v. Miller et al
as 1:2023cv01120
Plaintiff:
Capital S Investment Company Inc. and Karol Haim Schwartz
Defendant:
Director, NSC Loren K. Miller, Dir, USCIS Tracy Renaud, Sec., DHS Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Schwartz v. Bamz Enterprises, LLC
as 1:2023cv00608
Plaintiff:
Michael Schwartz
Defendant:
Bamz Enterprises, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Schwartz v. Lumico Insurance Company et al
as 1:2023cv00443
Plaintiff:
Michael Schwartz
Defendant:
Lumico Life Insurance Company, EDM Leads, LLC and Insured for Life, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Schwartz v. Homefix Custom Remodeling Corp
as 1:2023cv00375
Plaintiff:
Michael Schwartz
Defendant:
Homefix Custom Remodeling Corp
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Schwartz v. The Hall Insurance Group Inc.
as 1:2023cv00374
Plaintiff:
Michael Schwartz
Defendant:
The Hall Insurance Group Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Chung v. Upstart Holdings, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv03620
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Chung
Defendant:
Upstart Holdings, Inc., Jeff Huber, Kerry Cooper and others
Schwartz v. The Litigation Practice Group PC
as 1:2022cv00581
Plaintiff:
Michael Schwartz
Defendant:
The Litigation Practice Group PC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Ben B. Schwartz & Sons, Inc. v. Produce for Less LLC et al
as 4:2022cv12029
Defendant:
Hassan Y Mroueh, Produce for Less LLC and Hassan Y Mroue
Plaintiff:
Ben B. Schwartz & Sons, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499 Agricultural Commodities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
