Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Nathan Goddard, et alIn re: Nathan Goddard, et al
as 23-3398
Petitioner:
In re: NATHAN GODDARD, CAHKE CORTNER and LIONEL COMBS, III
Holmseth v. Page et al
as 3:2022cv00912
Plaintiff:
Timothy Charles Holmseth
Defendant:
Levi Henry Page, Alexandria Hannelore Goddard, John Doe 1-25 and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Metoyer-Goddard v. Jaddou et al
as 1:2022cv01008
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Metoyer-Goddard
Defendant:
Ur Mendoza Jaddou and Antony J. Blinken
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Dakota Girls, LLC, et al v. Philadelphia Indemnity Ins Co
as 21-3245
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BURKHOLD ENTERPRISES, LLC, dba Goddard School of Powell, FIXARI SCHOOL OF REYNOLDSBURG, LLC, dba Goddard School of Reynoldsburg, PARK SCHOOL OF GAHANNA, LLC, dba Goddard School of Gahanna and others
Defendant / Appellee:
PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY
Amicus Curiae:
UNITED POLICYHOLDERS
Calvin Goddard v. USA
as 19-5882
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner / Appellant:
CALVIN LEE GODDARD
Outlaw Laboratory, LP v. TELEGRAPH & GODDARD AMOCO SERVICE CENTER INC et al
as 3:2019cv12363
Defendant:
ASIL PETRO LLC, BB MART INC, BALFOUR #2 INC and others
Plaintiff:
Outlaw Laboratory, LP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
USA v. Calvin Goddard
as 19-5834
Defendant / Appellant:
CALVIN LEE GODDARD
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In re: Calvin Goddard
as 17-5674
Movant:
In re: CALVIN LEE GODDARD
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Calvin Goddard
as 16-5706
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CALVIN LEE GODDARD
Goddard v. U. S. Department of Education
as 3:2013cv00266
Plaintiff:
John J. Goddard
Defendant:
U. S. Department of Education
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
