Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Iesha Mitchell, et al v. City of Benton Harbor, MI, et al
as 23-1970
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IESHA MITCHELL, Guardian and next friend of A.M., KEA N. BENNETT, Guardian and next friend of A.B. next friend of S.B., et al., CHRISTINE ANDERSON, Guardian and next friend of A.L.next friend of D.L. 1 next friend of D.L. 2 next friend of M.L. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF BENTON HARBOR, MI, MARCUS MUHAMMAD, MICHAEL O'MALLEY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00488
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Mathis et al v United States of America
as 2:2023cv12227
Plaintiff:
Eleanor Mathis and Verdell Mathis
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Gregory MathisIn re: Gregory Mathis
as 23-5006
Petitioner:
In re: GREGORY LAMAR MATHIS
Respondent:
WARDEN JASON CLENDENION
USA v. Bryan Mathis
as 22-3578
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
BRYAN MATHIS
Mitchell et al v. Benton Harbor, City of et al
as 1:2022cv00475
Plaintiff:
Iesha Mitchell, Kea N. Bennett, Christine Anderson and others
Defendant:
Benton Harbor, City of, Marcus Muhammad, Michael O'Malley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
USA v. Xavier Mathis
as 21-1732
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellee:
XAVIER MATHIS
USA v. Danel Mathis, Jr.
as 21-5877
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DANEL TAWAN MATHIS, JR.
In re: Antonio Mathis
as 21-5573
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
In re: ANTONIO MATHIS
Timothy Pippin v. Carter County Detention Center, et al
as 20-6154
Defendant / Appellee:
J. B. SIMERLY, CHRIS MATHIS, Sheriff, TOM SMITH, Captain and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIMOTHY DOYLE PIPPIN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
