Cases 1 - 10 of 146
Yatinkumar Patel, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 24-3323
Petitioner:
YATINKUMAR TRIBHOVANDAS PATEL, MITTAL YATINKUMAR PATEL and AARAV YATINBHAI PATEL
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
USA v. Babubhai Patel
as 24-1066
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
BABUBHAI PATEL
Babubhai PatelIn re: Babubhai Patel
as 23-2105
Petitioner:
In re: BABUBHAI PATEL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In re: Babubhai Patel
as 23-2049
Petitioner:
In re: BABUBHAI PATEL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Patel et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 3:2023cv00614
Plaintiff:
Rakeshkumar Patel, Urmilaben Patel and Jay Patel
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas and Ur Jaddou
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Shari Oliver, et al v. Julie McDonald, et al
as 23-2007
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHARI LYNN OLIVER, M.A.O. and M.L.O.
Defendant / Appellee:
JULIE A. MCDONALD, MATTHEW W. OLIVER, PHILIP G. VERA and others
Carey, et al v. Whitehall Surgery Center, Ltd., et al
as 2:2023cv03774
Plaintiff:
Dr. Jeffrey Carey, Dr. William Gianakopoulos and Dr. Rashmi Patel
Defendant:
Whitehall Surgery Center, Ltd. d/b/a Pickerington Surgery Center, DR Steven P Balaloski, Dr. David Kim and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Declaratory Judgment
Nayanaben Patel v. Merrick Garland
as 23-3461
Petitioner:
NAYANABEN PATEL
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Best Western International Incorporated v. LABH Hospitality Inc. et al
as 2:2023mc50948
Plaintiff:
Best Western International Incorporated
Defendant:
LABH Hospitality Inc., Bhavin Patel and Manishaben Patel
Patel, et al v. Mayorkas, et al
as 3:2022cv00620
Plaintiff:
Vardhman Bharatkumar Patel and Ripal Vardhman Patel
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Director Ur M. Jaddou and Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
