Cases 1 - 10 of 23
v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2025cv00024
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, State of Alabama, State of Arkansas and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
State of Tennessee et al v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 3:2025cv00025
Plaintiff:
State of Tennessee, State of Alabama, State of Arkansas and others
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Xavier Becerra, in his official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Civil Rights
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Kentucky et al v. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission et al
as 3:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
State of Arkansas, State of Montana, State of Texas and others
Defendant:
Hester M. Peirce, Caroline A. Crenshaw, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
MCP No. 189 Corp. Avg. Fuel Econ (NHTSA-2023-0022)
as 24-7001
Petitioner:
STATE OF IDAHO, STATE OF MISSOURI, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA and others
Respondent:
PETER PAUL MONTGOMERY BUTTIGIEG, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Transportation, SOPHIE SHULMAN, in her official capacity as Deputy Administrator of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY ADMINISTRATION
WV, et al v. Peter Buttigieg, et al
as 24-3560
Petitioner:
STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
Respondent:
PETER PAUL MONTGOMERY BUTTIGIEG, Secretary, United States Department of Transportation,, SOPHIE SHULMAN, Deputy Administrator, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY ADMINISTRATION
KY, et al v. FHWA, et al
as 24-5532
Plaintiff:
STATE OF KANSAS, STATE OF OHIO, STATE OF WYOMING and others
Defendant:
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, PETER PAUL MONTGOMERY BUTTIGIEG, in his official capacity as Secretary of Transportation and others
State of Tennessee et al v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission et al
as 3:2024cv00224
Plaintiff:
State of Tennessee, State of Alabama, State of Alaska and others
Defendant:
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Charlotte A. Burrows, United States Department of Justice and others
Amicus Curiae:
America First Legal Foundation, National Women's Law Center, Small Business Majority and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
State of Tennessee v. Xavier Becerra, et al
as 24-5220
Plaintiff:
STATE OF TENNESSEE
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, JESSICA S. MARCELLA, in her official capacity as Deputy Assistant Secretary for Population Affairs and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ARKANSAS and others
Commonwealth of Kentucky et al v. Federal Highway Administration et al
as 5:2023cv00162
Plaintiff:
Commonwealth of Kentucky, State of South Dakota, State of Alabama and others
Defendant:
Federal Highway Administration, Shailen Bhatt, U.S. Department of Transportation and others
Interested Party:
The American Road and Transportation Builders Association and The Associated General Contractors of America
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
State of Tennessee, et al v. Department of Education, et al
as 22-5807
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF TENNESSEE, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ALASKA and others
Defendant / Appellant:
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, MIGUEL CARDONA, in his official capacity as Secretary of Education, EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION and others
Intervenor / Appellee:
ASSOCIATION OF CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INTERNATIONAL, A.S., a minor, by Brandi Scarborough, her mother, C.F., a minor, by Sara Ford, her mother and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
