Other Statutes Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00362
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
In re: Scott Thatcher
as 15-1320
Movant: In re: SCOTT ALAN THATCHER
Respondent: JERI-ANN SHERRY, Warden
In re: Gary Thatcher
as 13-1470
Movant: In re: GARY THATCHER
Respondent: PAUL KLEE, Warden
Stanton v. Hutchins et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv00074
Plaintiff: Jerry James Stanton
Defendant: Nancy Hutchins, Bambi Somerlott, Laurie Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Thatcher #384349 et al v. Eaton, County of et al
as 2:2009cv00272
Plaintiff: Gary Alva Thatcher #384349, Mark Curtin #263758, Curtis Smith #292372 and others
Defendant: Eaton, County of, Macomb, County of, Kent, County of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Cincinnati Bell Wireless, LLC v. City of Middletown Planning Co, et al
as 08-3569
Plaintiff - Appellee: CINCINNATI BELL WIRELESS, LLC
Defendant - Appellant: CITY OF MIDDLETOWN PLANNING COMMISSION, TOM BRICKLEY, FRED FINNEY and others
Cincinnati Bell Wireless, LLC v. City of Middletown Planning Commission
as 1:2007cv00022
Plaintiff: Cincinnati Bell Wireless, LLC, Cincinnati Bell Wireless, LLC and Cincinnati Bell Wireless, LLC
Defendant: City of Middletown Planning Commission, City of Middletown Planning Commission, Tom Brickey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?