Cases 1 - 10 of 2,354
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00368
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00193
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Steelite International U.S.A. Inc. v. RAK Porcelain USA, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00440
Plaintiff:
Steelite International U.S.A. Inc.
Defendant:
RAK Porcelain USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10433
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Scott Merritt v. Santander Consumer USA Inc., et al
as 24-1002
Plaintiff:
SCOTT A. MERRITT, Merritt Ventures, Inc.
Defendant:
SANTANDER CONSUMER USA INC., OGDEN LINCOLN OF WESTMONT and MARC LOZZO, Owner
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00679
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr Notice of Removal
California, State of v. Bosal Industries-Georgia, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv13150
Plaintiff:
California, State of
Defendant:
Bosal Industries-Georgia, Inc. and Bosal USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
California, State of v. MAHLE Behr GmbH & Co. KG et al
as 4:2023cv13100
Plaintiff:
California, State of
Defendant:
MAHLE Behr GmbH & Co. KG and MAHLE Behr USA Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv12970
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
