Cases 11 - 20 of 451
Moore v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02621
Plaintiff:
Randolph Moore
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., C.R. Bard, Inc., Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mulder v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00545
Plaintiff:
Susan Mulder
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury-Product Liability
Stinnett v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02115
Plaintiff:
Jared Stinnett
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., C.R.Bard, Inc., Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Martinez v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00736
Plaintiff:
Lynette Martinez
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Davol, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Parker v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00734
Plaintiff:
Gregory Parker
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., C. R. Bard, Inc., Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cardosi v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv10062
Plaintiff:
Lori Ann Cardosi
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Liguori v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv05569
Plaintiff:
Roseanne Liguori
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., C.R. Bard, Inc., Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ciampa v. C. R. Bard, Inc et al
as 2:2021cv05568
Plaintiff:
Philip Ciampa
Defendant:
C R Bard Inc, Ethicon Inc, Davol Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Garman v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv05108
Plaintiff:
David Garman
Defendant:
C.R. BARD, INC., Davol A Subsidiary C.R. Bard, Inc., Atrium Medical and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McLaughlin v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2021cv04999
Plaintiff:
Lynn McLaughlin
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., C.R. Bard Inc., Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
