Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Brandon Hefferan, et al v. Ethicon Endo-surgery Inc, et al
as 15-3619
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRANDON HEFFERAN and SABINE HEFFERAN
Defendant - Appellee:
ETHICON ENDO-SURGERY INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Schroeder v. Ethicon Endo Surgery, Inc.
as 3:2014cv02389
Plaintiff:
Timothy Schroeder
Defendant:
Ethicon Endo Surgery, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hefferan et al v. Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00911
Plaintiff:
Brandon Hefferan and Sabine Hefferan
Defendant:
Ethicon Endo-Surgery Inc and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mangrum v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2014cv00039
Plaintiff:
Wanda Mangrum
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Medical, Limited, Ethicon Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Puckett et al v. American Medical Systems Inc et al
as 1:2014cv00140
Plaintiff:
Sharon Puckett and Jerry Puckett
Defendant:
American Medical Systems Inc, American Medical Systems Holdings, Inc., Endo Health Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moores et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2013cv00864
Plaintiff:
Janet Katherine Moores and Scott Moores
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Medical, Limited, Ethicon Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clabo v. Johnson & Johnson Health Care Systems, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00329
Plaintiff:
Leslie Clabo
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Health Care Systems, Inc. and Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ames et al v. Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv02942
Plaintiff:
Derick Ames , Joshlin Ames , Mario Smith and others
Defendant:
Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson Health Care Systems, Inc. , Lee R Morisy and others
Miscellaneou:
Jimmy Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
