Cases 11 - 20 of 62
Dickstein v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv05623
Plaintiff:
Maurice Dickstein
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carter et al v. Snyder et al
as 2:2020cv10370
Plaintiff:
Samuel McNeal, Effern Bingham, Rickey Blumerich and others
Defendant:
Andy Dillon, Michael Glasgow, Bradley Wurfel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Betts v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00516
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Maurice Betts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Blevins et al v. SNYDER et al
as 5:2020cv10172
Plaintiff:
Kathy McCree, Margo Carpenter, Vernita Coleman and others
Defendant:
Michael Prysby, Leo A. Daly Company, Rowe Professional Services Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gibbs v. Oakland County Friend of Court
as 2:2019cv12249
Defendant:
Oakland County Friend of Court
Plaintiff:
Maurice Gibbs
Glover v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv01428
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., C.R. Bard, Inc. and Becton Dickinson & Company
Plaintiff:
Maurice Glover
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Zulu v. Metro Health Hospitals et al
as 1:2018cv02819
Defendant:
Dr. John K. Sontich, Jane Doe, Daniel Zalevsky and others
Plaintiff:
Maurice Rhoades Zulu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sims et al v. SNYDER et al
as 5:2018cv12387
Defendant:
Bradley Wurfel, Nick Lyon, Andy Dillon and others
Plaintiff:
Terry R. Prewitt, Aston Marion, Marion Harris-Ivey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Methodist Healthcare et al
as 2:2018cv02481
Plaintiff:
Maurice Robinson
Defendant:
University of Tenn., Clyde Jones, Regional One Health and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sweatt et al v. Dick's Flowers, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00592
Plaintiff:
Maurice Sweatt and Virginia Sweatt
Defendant:
Tammie Parsons and Dick's Flowers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
