Cases 21 - 30 of 62
Hernandez v. United States of America et al
as 2:2018cv11019
Plaintiff:
Noe Hernandez [E-Filer]
Defendant:
United States of America, Social Security Administration, William Seamen and others
Alexander et al v. Snyder et al
as 5:2018cv10631
Plaintiff:
Virgil Alexander , Mary Alexander , Dashawn Brown and others
Defendant:
Richard Snyder, Flint, City of, Receivership Transition Advisory Board and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Filing Error
as 1:2017cv02280
Petitioner:
Maurice Gales
Respondent:
Kimberly Clipper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Guy et al v. Western Express, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv02051
Plaintiff:
Daniel Guy and Laura Guy
Defendant:
Western Express, Inc. and Maurice Waller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Phyllis Bechtold, et al v. Medtronic, Inc., et al
as 16-4210
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PHYLLIS BECHTOLD, CATHY BEIL, NANCY BEGLEY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MEDTRONIC, INC. and MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK USA, INC.
Colley v. Proctor & Gamble Co. et al
as 1:2016cv00918
Plaintiff:
Rodney Colley , Doe 10 John , Matthew Farber and others
Defendant:
Procter & Gamble Co. and John Does 1-10
Receiver:
Matthew Craige
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Colley v. Proctor & Gamble Co. et al
as 2:2016cv00225
Plaintiff:
Rodney Colley , Doe 10 John , Matthew Farber and others
Defendant:
Procter & Gamble Co. and John Does 1-10
Receiver:
Matthew Craige
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United Services Automobile Association as Subrogee of Richard Colbert v. United States et al
as 2:2015cv02596
Plaintiff:
United Services Automobile Association as Subrogee of Richard Colbert
Defendant:
United States and Maurice Powers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
Norton et al v. United States of America
as 3:2015cv00046
Plaintiff:
Maurice D Norton , Sarah A. Harris, J D H, minor and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
