Cases 31 - 40 of 86
Treadway v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv00763
Plaintiff:
Mary Ann Treadway
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bauer v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
as 1:2014cv02595
Plaintiff:
Mary Ann Bauer
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rexroad v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv02292
Plaintiff:
Mary Ann Rexroad
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Perdue v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv01254
Plaintiff:
Mary Ann Perdue
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gareau v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc. et al
as 1:2013dp21410
Plaintiff:
Mary Anne Gareau
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Matthews v. Tobin
as 3:2013cv01065
Plaintiff:
Elaine Matthews
Defendant:
Mary Ann Tobin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Seip v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2013dp21267
Plaintiff:
Mary Ann Seip
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Siddhar v. Sivanesan et al
as 2:2013cv00747
Plaintiff:
Swamiji Sri Sel Vam Siddhar
Defendant:
Yasodhara Sivanesan, Richard E. Cox, Susan J. Kozar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Wulff v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2013dp20441
Plaintiff:
Mary Ann Wulff
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sylak et al v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.
as 3:2013cv00275
Plaintiff:
Mary Anne Sylak and Gary A. Sylak
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
