Cases 31 - 40 of 64
Shaw v. Love's Travel Stops and Country Stores Inc et al
as 2:2015cv03082
Plaintiff:
Alan Shaw
Defendant:
Love's Travel Stops and Country Stores Inc , John Doe and James Rowe Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Morgan et al v. Brooks Shaw & Son Old Country Store, Inc.
as 1:2015cv01219
Plaintiff:
Shelia Morgan and Randall Morgan
Defendant:
Brooks Shaw & Son Old Country Store, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shaw v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv02573
Plaintiff:
Mila V. Shaw
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shaw v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv02357
Plaintiff:
Mila V. Shaw
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shaw v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv01663
Plaintiff:
James E. Shaw
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lyons v. Kinsel et al
as 2:2015cv10160
Plaintiff:
Levert Lyons
Defendant:
Scott C Kinsel, Jeffrey D Hunt, Ethan L Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shaw v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv02047
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Shaw
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Quigley v. Mondelez Global, LLC et al (PLR1)
as 2:2014cv00075
Plaintiff:
Rachelle Lynn Quigley
Defendant:
Mondelez Global, LLC, Mondelez International, Inc. and Penske Truck Leasing Co. L.P.
Not Classified By Court:
Mediator Tracy Shaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shaw v. Weakley County Ambulance Service Inc.
as 1:2014cv01006
Plaintiff:
Gloria J. Shaw
Defendant:
Weakley County Ambulance Service Inc.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Shaw v. DePuy Orthopaedic Inc. et al
as 1:2013dp21512
Plaintiff:
Norval Bernard Shaw
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
