Cases 41 - 48 of 48
Wilkes County, Georgia v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2019op45171
Defendant:
Beverly Sackler, Richard S. Sackler, Anda, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
WILKES COUNTY, GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tyiska et al v. SNYDER et al
as 2:2018cv11841
Plaintiff:
Patrice Tyiska , Bobby Tucker , James Taylor and others
Defendant:
RICHARD D. SNYDER , Flint, City of, Receivership Transition Advisory Board and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Corey et al v. Snyder et al
as 2:2018cv11102
Plaintiff:
Iesha Corey , E. T. , Eric Tanner and others
Defendant:
Richard Dale Snyder, Flint, City of , Receivership Transition Advisory Board and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Setliff v. J & M Tank Lines, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00130
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Todd Setliff
Defendant:
J & M Tank Lines, Inc. and Gregory Birmingham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Grandberry et al v. Dayton Freight Lines Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv02850
Plaintiff:
Temika Grandberry , N G , Justin Moore and others
Defendant:
David E. Lentz and Dayton Freight Lines, Inc.
Miscellaneou:
Jimmy Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anderson et al v. Lockwood, Andrews & Newnam, P.C. et al
as 2:2017cv13289
Plaintiff:
Cyrstal Anderson , T. G. , M. L. and others
Defendant:
Lockwood, Andrews & Newnam, P.C., Lockwood, Andrews & Newnam, Inc., Leo A. Daly Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
McVay v. Armstrong International Inc., et al.
as 1:2013cv10001
Plaintiff:
Karen McVay
Defendant:
Armstrong International, Inc., Armstrong Pump, Inc., Air and Liquid Systems, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Asebstos Action- Refiled as Case No. 1:13-cv-10001
as 1:2013cv00394
Plaintiff:
Karen McVay
Defendant:
Armstrong International, Inc., Armstrong Pump, Inc., Air and Liquid Systems, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
