Cases 61 - 70 of 339
Atkins v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv05152
Plaintiff:
Tammy Atkins
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mounts et al v. 3M Company et al
as 7:2021cv00086
Defendant:
3M Company, Network Supply, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Mounts, Larry Epling, Mabel Epling and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Yates et al v. 3M Company et al
as 7:2021cv00085
Plaintiff:
Carter Yates, Estill Lowe, Marty Little and others
Defendant:
3M Company, Network Supply, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Givens v. Summit County Children Services et al
as 5:2021cv01929
Plaintiff:
Myracle Givens
Defendant:
Summit County Children Services, Scott Kemp, Tammy Sumpter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv04692
Plaintiff:
Tammy Williams
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McCarthy et al v. C.R Bard Inc et al
as 2:2021cv04277
Plaintiff:
Tammy McCarthy and Michael McCarthy
Defendant:
C.R Bard Inc and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Frasure v. WALMART EAST LP, a foreign limited partnership
as 2:2021cv11977
Plaintiff:
Tammy Frasure
Defendant:
WALMART EAST LP, a foreign limited partnership
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Parks et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv04006
Plaintiff:
DARREN PARKS and TAMMY M. PARKS
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Massey v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv03961
Plaintiff:
TAMMY R. MASSEY
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McIntire et al v. Whirlpool Corporation et al
as 3:2021cv01170
Defendant:
Whirlpool Corporation and Kenco Material Handlng Solutions, LLC
Plaintiff:
Tammy McIntire and Gary McIntire
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
