Cases 1 - 10 of 20
McMahan et al v. Olin Corporation et al (JRG1)
as 1:2024cv00096
Defendant:
Olin Corporation, Lonza Walkersville, Inc., Olin Chlor Alkali Products and others
Plaintiff:
LaMotta McMahan, Mauricio Acevedo, Marilyn B. Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Contreras v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00815
Plaintiff:
Dominicqua Contreras
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C.R Bard Inc
Contreras v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Berta Contreras
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Contreras v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
Francisco Contreras
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Contreras v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02720
Plaintiff:
Albert Contreras
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Contreras v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01632
Plaintiff:
Greg Contreras
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Contreras v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv04619
Plaintiff:
Celia Contreras
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MacIntyre v. David's Construction et al
as 3:2021cv00589
Plaintiff:
Justin D. MacIntyre
Defendant:
David's Construction, Volunteer State Construction, Alejandro Contreras and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Grant v. David's Construction et al
as 3:2021cv00104
Defendant:
Alejandro Contreras, Volunteer State Construction and David's Construction
Plaintiff:
Ariel Grant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Contreras et al v. Davol, Inc et al
as 2:2020cv06601
Plaintiff:
MARIA CONTRERAS and ANTONIO CONTRERAS
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
