Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Oliver et al v. Hull
as 2:2024cv02565
Plaintiff:
Bradley Faulkner, Michael Oliver, Attorney Louis P Chiozza, Jr and others
Defendant:
Richard Hull and Stephen C Barton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Allen v. Newton et al
as 3:2024cv00236
Plaintiff:
Evangeline Antionette Allen
Defendant:
Byron Zebedee Newton, Samuel Maxine Henderson and Michael Henderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Newton v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00982
Plaintiff:
Robert Newton
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Newton v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00654
Plaintiff:
Nicole Newton
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Newton v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00397
Plaintiff:
Paul Newton
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Newton's Pharmacy, Inc. v. Procter & Gamble Company et al
as 1:2023cv00613
Plaintiff:
Newton's Pharmacy, Inc.
Defendant:
Procter & Gamble Company, Kenvue, Inc., McNeil Consumer Healthcare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Hodges v. Milton et al
as 3:2022cv00385
Plaintiff:
Roger Hodges
Defendant:
Mark Milton and David Newton Trucking LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 mv Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Richardson-Newton v. C.R. Bard et al
as 2:2021cv05638
Plaintiff:
Terrance J. Richardson-Newton
Defendant:
C.R. Bard and Davol Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Newton v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv05258
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Newton
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Newton v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv04326
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Teresa Newton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
